Logo Home   Documents and Lists   Create   Site Settings   Help    Up to inter~logics
Icon
ESRC - Changing Forms of Organisation
Networks
 
 
 
Select a View
Threaded
Flat
 
 
Actions
  Alert me
  Modify settings and columns
 
 
New New Discussion
|
Expand/Collapse Expand/Collapse
 
SubjectReplies
Posted By
Modified
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
I find this extremely interesting about networks and other things

 
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:10
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
THIS IS MIKE'S RESPONSE BY EMAIL:
 
 
Many thanks Tom
Very interesting stuff - I am going to read this again more carefully but on first glance it supports some thoughts I have been having about personal development and networks.
I was with John M today; he asked me what was the next step on our "Networks" project.  I said that I thought it was to meet again on 29 April...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:11
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
THIS IS CHRIS'S RESPONSE
 
Hello all,
Yes it is interesting - though I'm not sure Michael Bauwens is saying much - if anything that hasn't been said (more simply and attractively I think) by relational practitioners from the Soc Con and A-N-T schools for 20+ years.  What is interesting is that in advocating a more active-participatory ontology he writes as a scientist - observing all this...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:12
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
 
TOM'S NEXT RESPONSE
 
Hi Chris, thanks for this.
 You say that
I'm not sure Michael Bauwens is saying much - if anything that hasn't been said (more simply and attractively I think) by relational practitioners from the Soc Con and A-N-T schools for 20+ years.
I'd be interested to hear more about what you intended to make happen by making this statement.
Perhaps the social...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:13
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
CHRIS:
 
Sorry Tom - I think you interpreted my comments as being dismissive. On the contrary - I think this stuff is important - however I do feel that the likes of Bruno Latour, Ken gergen and Richard Rorty say it better - for me anyway. My intention (rather than effect) - was to draw attention to the relational stuff and community that's already around. Maybe he does acknowledge these social...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:15
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
MIKE
 
 
Chris
I agree with you thrust - I am also interested in what networks can do.  Why does the NHS Cancer Plan of 2000 say that service quality and equality of access can only be delivered through networks?  And have the networks managed to deliver improvements on the old structural (and relational) arrangements? [So for me the structural and the relational are intertwined...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:16
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
CHRIS
 
Thanks Mike - I think we may be saying similar things.
I agree with you about different languages - it seems to me that 'knowing what to do next'  ('how to go on ' - is this Garfinkel?) in networks, distributed order as a matter of preference and judgement - as opposed to being simply swept up in them seems to be important - but I think this is different from 'design and control'....
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:16
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
JOHN MACK
 
Hi Gang
A few stray thoughts:
Thanks for the article Tom - as a result I've ordered the Fiske book - I like the sound of his four types of relationship. I have also been checking out Ultraculture as an idea
I had a quick look on Wiki to remind myself (!) what ontology is all about (double!) - bit of a messy entry really but I did like the part that said Ontology has one basic...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:17
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
TOM:
 
Hullo John - good to hear from you. Thanks for the thoughts - I certainly see myself as a "newbie" in all this too!
I'm not entirely clear as to why we are making these brilliant contributions by email? They seem to be just the sort of thing that the webspace Discussion Forum is for!
Cheers
Tom Boydell
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:19
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
JOHN MACK:
 
I think Mike said he preferred this medium. Do you think doing it through the forum would, dare I say, 'add value'? The only disadvantage this way is your inbox can get a bit crowded!
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:20
 
TRIGGERED BY NOTION THAT THE NEXT BUDDHA WILL BE A GROUP
 
TOM:
 
I find it harder to keep track of  a thread of conversation using email - even with only 5 of us. In a larger community I think it would become unmanageable. I know this particularcommunity probably won't get any bigger but we may well start another - well if the project goes head I would say we definitely will - so it could be a useful practice/experience to have a go on the web.
...
Tom Boydell
06/02/2008 18:22
 
Making sense of networks
 
I am trying here to carry over a discussion that began beteen Mike, John and myself in theCFO forum. What follows is the LAST item in the thread posted (by me). It is too difficult to repost all the items so I have attached a *.pdf file which reproduces that whole thread - or you can go to:
 
This posting followed questions...
Attachment
Chris Blantern
22/01/2008 11:18
 
Making sense of networks
 
Well I reakky want to paste soewmething here from your last item Chris, so that I can comment on it without retyping.
 
I copied it OK but IN can't find a paste function?
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 11:32
 
Making sense of networks
 
 
Thanks for starting this Chris.
 
"As to whether either/or networks are hierarchies are more naturally occuring - seems to me they are as much naturally occuring as each other - but useful in different contexts [which are changing and blurring]. "
 
I'm having a bit of difficulty understanding this. What is an either/or network?. Can you say more about this issue...
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 13:42
 
Making sense of networks
 
Let me try this Tom:-
 
"As to whether either networks or hierarchies are more naturally occuring - seems to me they are as much naturally occuring as each other - but useful in different contexts [which are changing and blurring]. "
 
...is what I meant to say. Sorry
Chris Blantern
22/01/2008 15:38
 
Making sense of networks
 
Thanks Chris - yes I understand both the staement and your view - that either might be, depending on context.
 
Somebody at the event said that they thought that hierarchies are more "natural". Leaping into stage model mode I think I would tend to believe that it depends on the stage of development of the particular context - group, organisation, communiuty, society. A characteristic...
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 15:54
 
OPENER
 
I'd like to get a good discussion going here. Can we make it work?
Tom Boydell
21/01/2008 20:15
 
OPENER
 
Well I don't know about that Tom, but at least I could get here.
 
Cheers
 
Mike
Mike Pedler
21/01/2008 20:49
 
OPENER
 
Well done Mike - for getting here!
 
In fact something curious has happened - I got the alert that yopu had added something but when I followed the ink it went to CFO public homepage, not to here. I will check this out with Chris.
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 10:29
 
OPENER
 
I sent an email about the alerts:-
"Must have been something to do with what you had open Tom - it worked fine for me. Can you try it again and see what happens? There are several links on an alert page too - they take you to different places - maybe this is the explanation?"
 
I will begin a theme in a new item - which I had previously enterred in the CFO discussion. It's to do with...
Chris Blantern
22/01/2008 10:55
 
OPENER
 
Yes it depends on which link ou click. The long one goes to CFO, the one under Networks comes here.
 
Incidentally I tried topaste thois comment in and couldn't find a way to do it - had to type from scratch. Pasting (or copying) doesn't seem a possibility?
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 11:06
 
OPENER
 
:-) Ah, I think I notice a pattern in your learning style here Tom - viz 'accommodating'  v 'assimilating'). I have just cut and pasted the whole of the next main item 'Making sense of networks'. It is possible.
 
Sometimes when you have lots of windows pen (used up too much memory) or if your 'clipboard' is full it might not work.
 
Chris
 
 
Chris Blantern
22/01/2008 11:28
 
OPENER
 
Copying is OK - I have copied from your last item and pasted in an email. But when I right click in here nothing opens - no pste or anything.
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 11:36
 
OPENER
 
Ah Tom - what you have to do is either Cntrl+V or got to Edit (in the toolbar atthe top of your browser) and select paste from there.
 
Chris
Chris Blantern
22/01/2008 11:43
 
OPENER
 
Thanks Chris - yes I now can paste.
Tom Boydell
22/01/2008 13:43